There's an interesting question: is Darla, as a soulless monster, capable of making the decision to kill them, or is she simply being used once again? In other words, is Angel (because it's his show, so it's always about him in the end, urgh) throwing the lawyers to two beasts who can't not do what they do, or is he letting Darla make the (not entirely unjustified) decision to kill or not kill them?
You might just convince me to watch AtS yet.
Though as shaky as the next few episodes are, and as much as I'm wary about sudden epiphanies teaching protagonists how their morally questionable actions make them better persons in the end
WORD to that in general.
if nothing we do matters... then all that matters is what we do. 'Cause that's all there is. What we do, now, today.
Wait, what? Didn't Buffy and Angel have that conversation in Amends? Do NOT make me rewatch that episode!
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2013-01-21 08:34 pm (UTC)You might just convince me to watch AtS yet.
Though as shaky as the next few episodes are, and as much as I'm wary about sudden epiphanies teaching protagonists how their morally questionable actions make them better persons in the end
WORD to that in general.
if nothing we do matters... then all that matters is what we do. 'Cause that's all there is. What we do, now, today.
Wait, what? Didn't Buffy and Angel have that conversation in Amends? Do NOT make me rewatch that episode!