LJ Terms Of Shit
Apr. 4th, 2017 07:42 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I just spent 20 minutes trying to add the following reply on the LJ News post (http://news.livejournal.com/151767.html):
Unfortunately, LJ won't let me sign in through OpenID, and when I created a Twitter account and signed on using that, I was told my reply was marked as spam.
(Remember that when LJ was first bought by the Russians, we were told that "Complaints will not be accepted. They'll get used to it. Anything sent in English is spam.")
So, fuck LJ.
Since I won't sign anything where I have no way of knowing what it is I'm signing, I'm commenting through (OpenID/Twitter).
Please note that in accordance with part 3 Article 10.1 of the Federal Act of the Russian Federation No. 149-ФЗ the Administration shall keep the following information and provide it upon the lawful request of the competent authorities regardless of Users will
I am not a Russian citizen. What is Article 10.2 of the Federal Act of the Russian Federation No. 149-ФЗ? Please provide me with a full text of it before I agree to it.
Mark Content estimated by Russian legislation as inappropriate for children (0 −18) as “adult material” by using Service functions.
I am not a Russian citizen. Please provide me with a comprehensive list of content that Russian legislation considers inappropriate for children, and which of these LJ intends to inforce.
ATTENTION: this translation of the User Agreement is not a legally binding document. The original User Agreement, which is valid, is located at the following address: http://www.livejournal.com/legal/tos-ru.bml.
I am not a Russian citizen. If the English translation is not valid, why do I need to sign it? What's in the Russian version that we're not told in the translation?
Unfortunately, LJ won't let me sign in through OpenID, and when I created a Twitter account and signed on using that, I was told my reply was marked as spam.
(Remember that when LJ was first bought by the Russians, we were told that "Complaints will not be accepted. They'll get used to it. Anything sent in English is spam.")
So, fuck LJ.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 09:09 pm (UTC)What's going on?
no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 09:15 pm (UTC)What you actually agree to is to conform to a number of Russian laws, the details of which you'll have to look up yourself; to not post things that the Russian government considers "inappropriate to children"; to accept that LJ has the right to give your e-mail address to spammers; and a few other neat things. (At least that's what the English translation seems to say, what the actual TOS says is a mystery.)
Basically: LJ is holding its users hostage until they agree with Terms of Service, and is refusing to tell them WHAT they're agreeing to, and also refusing to answer questions about it or even officially acknowledge that people have questions about it.
Hence the fuckage.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 09:20 pm (UTC)Okay, that's scared me off even trying to log in.
I saw you telling Barb you might leave fandom altogether. Please don't. :(
no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 09:32 pm (UTC)But right now I'm just too angry to make any serious decisions, so we'll see how I feel about it later. :)
no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 09:41 pm (UTC)There is a good community here on DW for talking about The Americans, if you're interested in that.
I'm just trying to read through this TOS (the English is not great). Have also read this 10.2 of Russian Federal Law no 149 and cannot say I am much the wiser. :(
no subject
Date: 2017-04-04 09:57 pm (UTC)There is a good community here on DW for talking about The Americans, if you're interested in that.
Neat, thanks! Is it
the English is not great
I saw someone who said they put the Russian version into Google Translate and the result looked very similar. I wonder if there's anyone working at LJ these days with any experience of communicating with people as opposed to being good at coding.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-05 07:35 am (UTC)Yes, it is. Very good discussions on there, though some of the posters are so knowledgeable they scare me a little bit.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 01:30 am (UTC)(I don't like the fact that my content is sitting on a Russian owned site...with what is happening at the moment in the US.)
So you can get in there without signing. That is until they figure out a way around that loophole.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-05 12:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-05 07:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-05 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-05 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-05 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-05 12:53 am (UTC)I'm not willing to sign the thing in order to delete my journal, which by the way annoys me that I can't delete it without signing the agreement. But it feels safer somehow.
You can by the way read LJ without signing it. Just don't log in. Actually you can do a lot anonymously on it by not logging in. I discovered that yesterday.
But they may decide it's spam.
Interestingly enough it doesn't apply to paid users (because it can't, since they aren't protected under the consumer rights act.)
no subject
Date: 2017-04-05 07:45 am (UTC)If I do sign, what I agree to only lasts as long as my actual LJ does. I'm thinking that might be worth it just to export comments etc over to DW before deleting my LJ.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 01:25 am (UTC)I suggest everyone do the same.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-05 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 12:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 02:39 am (UTC)There are folks on LJ who don't understand why we are leaving. They think all user agreements on social media are the same and just as sketchy. (I know they aren't.)
Apparently the JavaScript option is no longer available -- the LJ coders figured out we were using that. But Ghostery which blocks script and tracking on sites, might me.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-07 01:42 am (UTC)I figured the JavaScript option wouldn't last long. That's why I used it right away and shared that fix quickly.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 01:51 am (UTC)My mistake...was not leaving completely when they announced they were moving the servers to Russia. As a legal professional, I knew that what that meant, I've no excuse. But, damn, I was on lj since 2003, I didn't want to leave.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-11 08:55 pm (UTC)I had ported my LJ journals to dreamwidth after they'd announced moving to the Russian servers, but I hadn't closed LJ down completely.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-05 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-05 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 02:42 am (UTC)But it will take 60 days. And it's blocked from my use during that time. Although that was always the case.
No, I'm gone. The user agreement was the point of no return for me.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 05:26 am (UTC)2) I should have posted the full text of "even in vegas" and seen how long it took to offend someone
no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 06:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-06 02:25 pm (UTC)