![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Joining the chorus: Please don't auto-share my stuff to Facebook or Twitter or anything like that without asking me first. Reccing within LJ is fine, of course.
Could someone please buy LJ a shiny yo-yo, so they don't get bored and spend their time coming up with functions that just make things worse?
ETA 1: The Greasemonkey script will get rid of the Twitter/Facebook buttons in your own browser, but it won't stop anyone else from automatically (or by mistake) reposting your posts or comments on your posts.
ETA 2: And no tags with slashes in them work anymore. Though I suppose it's possible that Buffy/Angel, being the only acceptable canon OTP, still works.
Could someone please buy LJ a shiny yo-yo, so they don't get bored and spend their time coming up with functions that just make things worse?
ETA 1: The Greasemonkey script will get rid of the Twitter/Facebook buttons in your own browser, but it won't stop anyone else from automatically (or by mistake) reposting your posts or comments on your posts.
ETA 2: And no tags with slashes in them work anymore. Though I suppose it's possible that Buffy/Angel, being the only acceptable canon OTP, still works.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 03:20 pm (UTC)1) Allow others to repost your stuff to Twitter and Facebook at will simply by clicking a little box when they comment. You can also repost your own posts to Twitter and Facebook by clicking a little box when you post. This is the default.
2) Set it so your posts and comments to them are always automatically posted to Twitter and Facebook.
There is no "Get rid of the fucking Twitter and Facebook crossposting function completely" option.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 09:33 pm (UTC)Hang on. I thought it only reposted your own comment? So if
I...don't understand.
About 6 hours ago via Twitter for LiveJournal
But it wouldn't repost what you wrote, surely? Unless he cut and pasted it, but he could do that into Twitter anyway. Not that I see the point...
no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 09:38 pm (UTC)And he can still share any post of mine with one click using that little "share" button at the top of the page.
ETA: Example. (http://dysonrules.livejournal.com/200879.html)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-02 02:07 pm (UTC)True, but the difference is that before, you had to make an effort to post something to Twitter. You'd have to copy and paste the post with the specific intent to tweet it.
Now, you could simply be quoting a post (or comment, as I just did to yours) in your reply and then accidentally post it to Twitter just by clicking the wrong box.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-02 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 08:15 pm (UTC)There is someone whose job it is to come up with new functions. If he doesn't come up with any then they'll decide there is no need for his position to exist. Consequently he has to make changes, even when he knows they're for the worse, to safeguard his job. It's the same in all organisations.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 08:32 pm (UTC)*checks*
...Fuckers.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-01 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-02 02:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-02 04:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-02 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-13 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-13 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-13 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-13 06:59 pm (UTC)